Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BIG REQUEST--Geographic Name Authorities #33

Open
smluke2 opened this issue Feb 17, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

BIG REQUEST--Geographic Name Authorities #33

smluke2 opened this issue Feb 17, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@smluke2
Copy link

smluke2 commented Feb 17, 2025

I am not sure if this is possible or this is a larger request that also deals with LC Authorities. 260 and 264 are transcribed fields and we have to go through and quality control using authorized terms. Is there any way to query the LC Authorities and replace with the correct version of the geographic name, if discernible?

Examples:
Springfield, Ill.
Springfield IL
Springfield, Illinois
--> all should be Springfield (Ill.)

@henryborchers
Copy link
Contributor

henryborchers commented Feb 21, 2025

@smluke2 From what I can figure out, I SHOULD be able to query this authority file and check if it is a valid name. I've had luck being able to send API requests to records where the official "label" is known. For example. https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/label/Springfield%20(Ill.) will resolve to https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79041941.html

I think I have a way of checking for possible records. For example:
GET https://id.loc.gov/search/?q=scheme:http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names&q=memberOf:http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/collection_GeographicSubdivisions&q=Springfield, Illinois&format=json

Replacing it automatically with the correct version is a bit more work.

@henryborchers
Copy link
Contributor

@smluke2 I assume you are looking to validate the places in "260a" and "264a" and not "b" and "c". It seems like "b" and "c" are not geographic places. Is this correct?

@smluke2
Copy link
Author

smluke2 commented Mar 5, 2025 via email

@henryborchers
Copy link
Contributor

#44 helps locate geographic terms used that are not in the LOC authority

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants