-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BIG REQUEST--Geographic Name Authorities #33
Comments
@smluke2 From what I can figure out, I SHOULD be able to query this authority file and check if it is a valid name. I've had luck being able to send API requests to records where the official "label" is known. For example. https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/label/Springfield%20(Ill.) will resolve to https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79041941.html I think I have a way of checking for possible records. For example: Replacing it automatically with the correct version is a bit more work. |
@smluke2 I assume you are looking to validate the places in "260a" and "264a" and not "b" and "c". It seems like "b" and "c" are not geographic places. Is this correct? |
#44 helps locate geographic terms used that are not in the LOC authority |
I am not sure if this is possible or this is a larger request that also deals with LC Authorities. 260 and 264 are transcribed fields and we have to go through and quality control using authorized terms. Is there any way to query the LC Authorities and replace with the correct version of the geographic name, if discernible?
Examples:
Springfield, Ill.
Springfield IL
Springfield, Illinois
--> all should be Springfield (Ill.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: