Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARM support #21

Open
IGLADI opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

ARM support #21

IGLADI opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@IGLADI
Copy link

IGLADI commented May 1, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I just discovered this fork which I would like to use , however no arm version is uploaded to docker hub (which is the case for searxng) so it's impossible to to self host on raspberry pis or similar. (or even for mac users)

Describe the solution you'd like
I would suggest automatically building an arm variant with smth like docker builx when publishing to docker hub.

@IGLADI IGLADI added the enhancement New feature or request label May 1, 2024
@mehr32
Copy link
Collaborator

mehr32 commented May 9, 2024

Hello! I have been busy for a while, sorry for the late reply. In the description of the first page, the installation method with Docker is mentioned. This is the latest image, i.e. version 0.3. However, due to Docker's problems, the searxng file format has problems and it is recommended to run it through the source. We hope to solve it for the next version

https://hub.docker.com/layers/moaengine/moa/uranium/images/sha256-f82fd4de343f16d2f571ea1d678cfcca34eded071884b6b25c52f06db12af3fc?context=explore

@mehr32
Copy link
Collaborator

mehr32 commented May 9, 2024

And for logo support: this or another user also had this problem. It requires rewriting the Docker file, which I have to write from scratch. It may take a while to get used. We would be happy if users also contribute to the development :)

@IGLADI
Copy link
Author

IGLADI commented May 9, 2024

And for logo support: this or another user also had this problem. It requires rewriting the Docker file, which I have to write from scratch. It may take a while to get used. We would be happy if users also contribute to the development :)

Huh? Wdym logo support? I havn't talked about logo support? Or do you mean ARM support? (cz I was referring to ARM the cpu architecture)
I'm kinda of a rush on a school project right now but afterwards I would be happy to, where would you need help with?

@IGLADI
Copy link
Author

IGLADI commented May 9, 2024

Hello! I have been busy for a while, sorry for the late reply. In the description of the first page, the installation method with Docker is mentioned. This is the latest image, i.e. version 0.3. However, due to Docker's problems, the searxng file format has problems and it is recommended to run it through the source. We hope to solve it for the next version
https://hub.docker.com/layers/moaengine/moa/uranium/images/sha256-f82fd4de343f16d2f571ea1d678cfcca34eded071884b6b25c52f06db12af3fc?context=explore

Yeah but then it won't take the latest updates on restart right? Unlike amd64 users would be able by just using the latest tag in a docker-compose.yml

@mehr32
Copy link
Collaborator

mehr32 commented May 10, 2024

And for logo support: this or another user also had this problem. It requires rewriting the Docker file, which I have to write from scratch. It may take a while to get used. We would be happy if users also contribute to the development :)

Huh? Wdym logo support? I havn't talked about logo support? Or do you mean ARM support? (cz I was referring to ARM the cpu architecture) I'm kinda of a rush on a school project right now but afterwards I would be happy to, where would you need help with?

Oh no! Yes, I meant just that (translator messed it up :/ ). We have a lot of work to help with. I don't know what your profession is and what topic you could contribute in?

@mehr32
Copy link
Collaborator

mehr32 commented May 10, 2024

Hello! I have been busy for a while, sorry for the late reply. In the description of the first page, the installation method with Docker is mentioned. This is the latest image, i.e. version 0.3. However, due to Docker's problems, the searxng file format has problems and it is recommended to run it through the source. We hope to solve it for the next version
https://hub.docker.com/layers/moaengine/moa/uranium/images/sha256-f82fd4de343f16d2f571ea1d678cfcca34eded071884b6b25c52f06db12af3fc?context=explore

Yeah but then it won't take the latest updates on restart right? Unlike amd64 users would be able by just using the latest tag in a docker-compose.yml

Yes, it was my mistake. Access to Docker Hub is a bit difficult for me, so I accidentally pushed the image on the wrong tag. This mistake will not happen in the next version.

@IGLADI
Copy link
Author

IGLADI commented May 20, 2024

And for logo support: this or another user also had this problem. It requires rewriting the Docker file, which I have to write from scratch. It may take a while to get used. We would be happy if users also contribute to the development :)

Huh? Wdym logo support? I havn't talked about logo support? Or do you mean ARM support? (cz I was referring to ARM the cpu architecture) I'm kinda of a rush on a school project right now but afterwards I would be happy to, where would you need help with?

Oh no! Yes, I meant just that (translator messed it up :/ ). We have a lot of work to help with.

Sorry for the late reply I'm still in uni and it's close to my finals 😅
I would happily do this part and more after my finals if we could take some time to discuss about the project so you can show me all the problems, what has to be done, directions you want to take ect.

I don't know what your profession is and what topic you could contribute in?

I'm a applied computer science student, I should be able to help with most things especially docker & python being the main language of this project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants