Skip to content

List of models (what are restrictions on how we can put together) #33

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
7 of 8 tasks
Tracked by #22
theo-cox opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 5 comments
Open
7 of 8 tasks
Tracked by #22

List of models (what are restrictions on how we can put together) #33

theo-cox opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@theo-cox
Copy link
Contributor

theo-cox commented Jan 25, 2023

Outline of how buildings blocks combine into overall models, and the constraints and considerations around combining them.

I think this effort involves

Acceptance

  • List of models
  • Finalized list of models with descriptions these are now on the site, pending minor adjustments
  • Model descriptions (one notes page for each one and an index page) as above
  • Guide to choosing a model: how context etc influences efficacy and feasibility We discussed this a lot and decided that decision trees are the best way to do this. These are TODO
    • Key principles/rules for combining building blocks, including mutual exclusivity and incompatibility Decided we likely aren't going to do this beyond the very high level paragraph contained in /concepts.md
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in Backlog (All) Jan 25, 2023
@theo-cox theo-cox moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in Backlog (All) Jan 25, 2023
@rufuspollock rufuspollock moved this to 🆕 New in Diginomics Jan 30, 2023
@rufuspollock rufuspollock moved this from 🆕 New to 🏗 In progress in Diginomics Jan 31, 2023
@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

@theo-cox prompted by work in #41 i looked up our last work and i think that is also publishable as next post in series as aa "draft synthesis of possible models" or similar:

I think just putting this stuff up (maybe with a very small bit of polish and context) would be fine as a follow up post.

@theo-cox
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have also added a more extensive decision tree type structure to https://excalidraw.com/#room=593eed26b94deea8a355,jxO0LGmHClWcDkg7eSbdTA - we can see if we want to use that also

@theo-cox
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rufuspollock rufuspollock moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🏗 In progress in Backlog (All) Mar 22, 2023
@theo-cox theo-cox moved this from 🏗 In progress to 🔖 Ready in Backlog (All) Apr 6, 2023
@theo-cox
Copy link
Contributor Author

WONTFIX. We're not going to do the decision tree for the moment, due to a shift in focus to the email guide idea (#72)

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🔖 Ready to ✅ Done in Backlog (All) Apr 26, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to ✅ Done in Diginomics Apr 26, 2023
@rufuspollock
Copy link
Contributor

@theo-cox hi, it wasn't my understanding that we weren't doing the decision tree ... I think worth splitting that to a separate issue so we can close.

Also to summarize what i thought the state of play was:

  • We had overview of business models including schema, building blocks and some notes on constraints (this is concepts?)
  • We did have a list of the major types of model (maybe at economy-scale?) which we had written up. Have we published these?
    • this would preferably include a mapping against our previous model categories we had had ...
  • Finally, it would be good to do a review of what we have published and maybe tidy a bit

@rufuspollock rufuspollock reopened this Apr 26, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from ✅ Done to 🔖 Ready in Diginomics Apr 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants