Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Orderless" mining may require "Exact" to avoid a combinatorial explosion #68

Open
kliegr opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@kliegr
Copy link

kliegr commented Sep 20, 2021

Issue #67 notes that orderless mining of a task with two atom patterns in the body may take very long if not combined with the "Exact" option which would prevent the addition of additional atoms to the body (if maximum rule length allows this).

It might be a good idea to explain this / warn the user in the help for the Orderless option.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant