Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WAS ResponseTimes: Disaggregate non-HTTP response times #302

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kgibm
Copy link
Member

@kgibm kgibm commented Mar 21, 2025

Confirmed that Dave is happy with this.

Previously, for ResponseTimes, non-HTTP work would be aggregated together into a null URI column. Instead, what this PR does is if it's non-HTTP work, then it sets the "URI" to the type of work (e.g. IIOP, MDB, etc.). This way we get response times disaggregated by the type of non-HTTP work and then this makes it easier to throw into a pivot table to break down response times of EJBs vs MDBs, etc.

Example output:

$ java -Xmx1g "-Dcom.ibm.ws390.smf.dateTimeFormat=yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ" -DPRINT_WRAPPER=false -Dcom.ibm.ws390.smf.smf1209.useTime=RESPONDED -Dcom.ibm.ws390.smf.smf1209.breakdown=BY_SERVER -jar smftools.jar "INFILE(SF.T01850.MTFTP.F001)" "PLUGIN(com.ibm.smf.was.plugins.ResponseTimes,STDOUT)"
Time,Server,Requests,AvgResponse,MaxResponse,AvgQueue,AvgDisp,AvgCPU,AvgOffload,AvgOffload%,AvgBytesRcvd,AvgBytesSent,URI
"2025-02-13T20:54:00.000+0000",LPAR1,42,1,7,0,0,0,0,0.8333333,0,0,MBean
"2025-02-13T20:54:00.000+0000",LPAR1,85,40,1426,0,40,4,2,0.6537468,0,0,MDBA
"2025-02-13T20:54:00.000+0000",LPAR1,22094,1,5102,0,1,0,0,0.43708295,533,9843,IIOP
"2025-02-13T20:54:00.000+0000",LPAR1,12,2,5,0,1,0,0,1.0,0,0,Other
"2025-02-13T20:55:00.000+0000",LPAR1,1,3,3,0,3,0,0,0.0,397,329,/Servlet1

Signed-off-by: Kevin Grigorenko <kevin.grigorenko@us.ibm.com>
@kgibm
Copy link
Member Author

kgibm commented Mar 21, 2025

@jbouzak Please review when you have a chance, thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant