Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IMP] hr_employee_cost_history: add comment field in history line #735

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

glitchov
Copy link

@glitchov glitchov commented Jan 30, 2025

This PR adds a comment field on the history line to tell why the cost change did happen.

closes #696

A very small fix has been added for hr_timesheet_name_customer because Odoo has added a new test in sale_timesheet (test_billing_project/test_take_into_account_invoicing_app_legacy) which failed without doing a secure get in vals dict.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @edlopen, @rafaelbn,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

Copy link
Member

@sbidoul sbidoul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested on runboat

image

Code looks good.

Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@FrancoMaxime FrancoMaxime left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM: code review

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

Copy link
Member

@marcelsavegnago marcelsavegnago left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge minor

@EmilioPascual @Shide FYI

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-735-by-rafaelbn-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2025
Signed-off-by rafaelbn
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@rafaelbn your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-735-by-rafaelbn-bump-minor.

After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red.

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

@glitchov ! 😄 thanks! Please review, test fails 🔴 ! ❤️

@glitchov
Copy link
Author

@rafaelbn Hi Rafael, i had a look but i can't reproduce and it has nothing to do with my changes sorry.

@glitchov glitchov force-pushed the 16.0-imp-hr_employee_cost_history_add_comment_field-hda branch from cd27944 to 8fe32ab Compare February 24, 2025 09:40
@sbidoul
Copy link
Member

sbidoul commented Feb 24, 2025

The error is in hr_timesheet_name_customer, probably due to a change in Odoo.

@rafaelbn
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @rafaelbn you are not allowed to merge.

To do so you must either have push permissions on the repository, or be a declared maintainer of all modified addons.

If you wish to adopt an addon and become it's maintainer, open a pull request to add your GitHub login to the maintainers key of its manifest.

@sbidoul sbidoul force-pushed the 16.0-imp-hr_employee_cost_history_add_comment_field-hda branch from b88ba1e to 8fe32ab Compare February 28, 2025 10:35
@sbidoul
Copy link
Member

sbidoul commented Feb 28, 2025

@glitchov I removed your fix for hr_timesheet_name_customer from here and made a more complete fix in #744

@sbidoul
Copy link
Member

sbidoul commented Feb 28, 2025

@rafaelbn the branch is green again. Can you retry the merge?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants