Skip to content

Temporal Sharing Overhead test ELF flow (mobilenet) #8866

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025

Conversation

Json288
Copy link
Collaborator

@Json288 Json288 commented Apr 9, 2025

Problem solved by the commit

Enable ELF flow for temporal sharing overhead (mobile net)

How problem was solved, alternative solutions (if any) and why they were rejected

Convert corresponding xclbin and dpu sequence files to modern xclbin and elf files. Change the workflow in test to ELF flow. Remove the DPU sequence flow.

What has been tested and how, request additional testing if necessary

Tested on Windows with MCDM using following command:
xrt-smi validate -r temporal-sharing-overhead --advanced

@Json288 Json288 requested a review from aktondak April 9, 2025 23:48
@gbuildx
Copy link
Collaborator

gbuildx commented Apr 9, 2025

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

jamesong and others added 4 commits April 10, 2025 15:22
Signed-off-by: jamesong <james.song@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: jamesong <james.song@amd.com>
jamesong added 2 commits April 10, 2025 16:01
…tValidateUtilities

Signed-off-by: jamesong <james.song@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: jamesong <james.song@amd.com>
@Json288 Json288 marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2025 23:24
@AShivangi AShivangi requested review from stsoe and aktondak April 11, 2025 17:38
…ording to comments

Signed-off-by: jamesong <james.song@amd.com>
@stsoe stsoe merged commit 56222ed into Xilinx:master Apr 11, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants