Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GitHub Actions workflow for benchmarking and commenting on PR #269

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

ZenVoich
Copy link
Owner

@ZenVoich ZenVoich commented Mar 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an automation that runs performance benchmarks on pull requests targeting the main branch, with results automatically displayed as comments to provide clear insights during review.
    • Added new benchmarking data files for various operations, including buffer, vector, and array operations, enhancing performance analysis capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the logic for displaying benchmark results, particularly for "Stable Memory" metrics, ensuring accurate representation based on conditions.
  • Enhancements

    • Updated the display of total downloads in the PackageRightPanel for better readability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file has been added to automate benchmark execution on pull requests targeting the main branch. The workflow runs on an Ubuntu 24.04 environment and consists of several steps including repository checkout, Node.js setup with npm caching, installing the DFX tool and mops packages, building the CLI, and running benchmarks with mops bench. The workflow captures the benchmark results and either creates or updates a comment on the pull request with the output. Additionally, several new JSON files have been introduced, containing benchmarking results for various data structures and operations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml Introduces a new workflow to run benchmarks: sets up environment (Node.js, DFX, mops), executes mops bench, and comments results on PRs.
.bench/1-buffer-vector-add.bench.json New JSON file with benchmarking results for buffer and vector operations, including performance metrics for various sizes.
.bench/2-vector-buffer-add.bench.json New JSON file with benchmarking results for "Vector" and "Buffer" data structures, detailing performance metrics across sizes.
.bench/array.bench.json New JSON file containing benchmarking data for various array operations, capturing performance metrics for different scenarios.
.bench/removeLast.bench.json New JSON file with benchmarking data for "Vector:remove 70k" and "Buffer:remove 70k" operations, including performance metrics.
.bench/stable-memory.bench.json New JSON file containing benchmarking data for memory management, detailing performance metrics under different conditions.
cli/commands/bench.ts Modifications to enhance logic for displaying benchmark results, focusing on "Stable Memory" metrics and conditional formatting.
cli/package.json Updated "commander" dependency version from "12.1.0" to "13.1.0".
frontend/components/package/PackageRightPanel.svelte Modified total downloads display to use toLocaleString() for better readability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Env as Environment Setup
    participant Bench as Benchmark Job
    participant Comm as Comment Manager

    PR->>GH: Trigger workflow on PR targeting main
    GH->>Env: Checkout repository & setup Node.js environment
    Env->>GH: Environment ready
    GH->>Bench: Install DFX, cache mops packages, install npm dependencies, build CLI, install mops tool
    Bench->>Bench: Execute `mops bench` command
    Bench->>Comm: Capture results and search existing bot comment
    Comm->>PR: Create new comment or update existing comment with benchmark results
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • Stable memory and GC bench #247: The changes in the main PR, which introduce a new GitHub Actions workflow for benchmarking, are related to the retrieved PR as both involve enhancements to benchmarking metrics, specifically including rts_logical_stable_memory_size in their respective contexts.
  • Verify build #249: The changes in the main PR, which introduce a new GitHub Actions workflow for running benchmarks, are related to the retrieved PR as both involve modifications to GitHub Actions workflows, specifically in the context of CI/CD processes, although they do not directly modify the same functions or variables.

Poem

I'm a rabbit dancing in code delight,
Hoping through workflows in the moonlight.
Benchmarks run, and my ears perk high,
As GitHub Actions comment as I sigh.
With hops and bytes, I cheer this spree,
A tiny rabbit coding with glee!
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

frontend/components/package/PackageRightPanel.svelte

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.0

Error: Failed to load plugin 'svelte' declared in 'frontend/.eslintrc.json': Cannot find module 'svelte/compiler'
Require stack:

  • /node_modules/svelte-eslint-parser/lib/parser/template.js
  • /node_modules/svelte-eslint-parser/lib/parser/index.js
  • /node_modules/svelte-eslint-parser/lib/index.js
  • /node_modules/eslint-plugin-svelte/lib/rules/infinite-reactive-loop.js
  • /node_modules/eslint-plugin-svelte/lib/utils/rules.js
  • /node_modules/eslint-plugin-svelte/lib/index.js
  • /node_modules/@eslint/eslintrc/dist/eslintrc.cjs
    Referenced from: /frontend/.eslintrc.json
    at Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1248:15)
    at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1074:27)
    at TracingChannel.traceSync (node:diagnostics_channel:315:14)
    at wrapModuleLoad (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:217:24)
    at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1339:12)
    at require (node:internal/modules/helpers:135:16)
    at Object. (/node_modules/svelte-eslint-parser/lib/parser/template.js:4:20)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1546:14)
    at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1691:10)
    at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1317:32)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (2)

15-18: Matrix Configuration for Node.js Version

The property "node-version" is currently set to use \${{ matrix.node-version }}; however, there is no matrix strategy defined in the job. This means the variable may be undefined at runtime. Consider one of the following approaches:

  • Define a matrix strategy: If you intend to test against multiple Node.js versions, add a strategy.matrix block specifying the node-version values.
  • Use a static value: If only one Node.js version is needed, replace the matrix variable with a literal (e.g., '16').

Example diff if a static value is preferred:

-          node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }}
+          node-version: '16'
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

17-17: property "node-version" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)


71-71: Ensure Newline at End-of-File

YAMLlint indicates that there is no newline character at the end of the file. Adding a newline at the end helps avoid formatting warnings and ensures compatibility with various tools.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 71-71: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5fcf709 and 4596832.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

17-17: property "node-version" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

[error] 71-71: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: macos-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ic-mops@1.0.0
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ic-mops@1.0.0

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Benchmark Results

Benchmark files:
• bench/1-buffer-vector-add.bench.mo
• bench/2-vector-buffer-add.bench.mo
• bench/array.bench.mo
• bench/removeLast.bench.mo
• bench/stable-memory.bench.mo

Add (second)

Add items one-by-one (second)

Instructions

10 10000 1000000
Buffer 10_589 $({\color{green}-22.08\%})$ 6_204_478 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 573_081_816 $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Vector 15_416 $({\color{red}+35.04\%})$ 4_909_875 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 468_132_811 $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Heap

10 10000 1000000
Buffer 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Vector 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Garbage Collection

10 10000 1000000
Buffer 1.09 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 143.28 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 12.02 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Vector 1.09 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 45.65 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 3.86 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Add

Add items one-by-one

Instructions

10 10000 1000000
Vector 15_416 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 4_910_243 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 468_155_259 $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Buffer 10_589 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 6_203_374 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 573_078_872 $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Heap

10 10000 1000000
Vector 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Buffer 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Garbage Collection

10 10000 1000000
Vector 1.09 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 45.65 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 3.86 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Buffer 1.09 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 143.28 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 12.02 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Array

arr arr

Instructions

100k x1 reset1 100k x3 reset2 100k x4 reset3
Array 15_002_649 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 4_455 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 30_004_139 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 5_073 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 60_005_196 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 5_691 $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Heap

100k x1 reset1 100k x3 reset2 100k x4 reset3
Array 390.9 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ -390.37 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 390.9 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ -390.37 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 390.9 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ -390.37 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Garbage Collection

100k x1 reset1 100k x3 reset2 100k x4 reset3
Array 360 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 390.97 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 391 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 390.97 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 1.14 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 390.97 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Remove items using removeLast

Vector and buffer are initialized with 100k items and then 70k items are removed one-by-one.

Instructions

remove 70k
Vector 32_210_297 $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Buffer 31_716_422 $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Heap

remove 70k
Vector -136.8 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Buffer -269.76 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Garbage Collection

remove 70k
Vector 139.45 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$
Buffer 540.43 KiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Stable Memory and Region

Grow Region and store blobs in it

Instructions

Region (fill 1/100) Region (fill 1/50) StableMemory
10 pages 65_117_422 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 260_557_814 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 2_861 $({\color{gray}0\%})$
100 pages 1_302_325_766 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 2_604_593_980 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 2_954 $({\color{gray}0\%})$
256 pages 3_334_080_226 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 6_668_025_672 $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 3_704 $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Heap

Region (fill 1/100) Region (fill 1/50) StableMemory
10 pages 296 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 276 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$
100 pages 308 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 308 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 272 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$
256 pages 308 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 308 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 276 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Garbage Collection

Region (fill 1/100) Region (fill 1/50) StableMemory
10 pages 2.38 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 9.51 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 336 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$
100 pages 47.55 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 95.1 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 340 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$
256 pages 121.73 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 243.45 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 340 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Stable Memory

Region (fill 1/100) Region (fill 1/50) StableMemory
10 pages 8 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 8 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 8 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$
100 pages 8 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 8 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 0 B $({\color{gray}0\%})$
256 pages 16 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 16 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$ 16 MiB $({\color{gray}0\%})$

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (1)

67-73: Comment Creation or Update and File Newline
The final step, which uses peter-evans/create-or-update-comment@v4, correctly updates or creates a comment with the benchmark results. Additionally, note that YAMLlint flagged a missing newline at the end of the file. Please ensure a newline is added at the end to conform to best practices.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 73-73: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4596832 and 3b26999.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • mops.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

17-17: property "node-version" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

[error] 73-73: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Run Benchmarks and Comment
  • GitHub Check: node 20, moc 0.11.1, ic-mops@1.0.0
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ./cli/dist
  • GitHub Check: macos-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ./cli/dist
🔇 Additional comments (10)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (10)

1-2: Workflow Name Clarity
The workflow name "Comment Benchmarks" clearly reflects that its purpose is to execute benchmarks and post the results as comments on pull requests.


3-7: Trigger Configuration
The workflow is set to trigger on pull requests targeting the "main" branch, which aligns with the PR objectives. Verify that this trigger covers all intended scenarios, or if additional triggers (e.g., pushes to specific branches) might be needed in the future.


8-12: Job Definition and Environment Setup
The job "benchmark" is configured to run on ubuntu-24.04 and includes a clear, descriptive name. This is consistent with the intended environment for benchmark execution.


20-27: DFX Installation Steps
The steps to install the DFX tool, confirm its installation via dfx --version, and install the DFX cache are clear and appear to be in the correct order. Ensure that the version installed meets your project requirements.


29-37: Caching Mops Packages
The caching configuration for mops packages is well-structured using the hash of the mops.toml file for the cache key. Please double-check that the mops.toml file’s location is accurate relative to the repository root.


39-43: CLI Setup Steps
The steps to install npm packages in the cli directory and build the local CLI using npm run prepare are straightforward and correctly sequenced.


45-46: Global Installation of Mops
Installing the mops CLI globally using npm i -g ./cli/dist is a solid approach. Just ensure that the built CLI behaves as expected when installed globally.


48-49: Mops Packages Installation
The step to install mops packages with mops install is concise and clear, ensuring dependencies are in place before running benchmarks.


51-58: Benchmark Execution and Output Capture
The benchmark step executes mops bench and captures its output correctly by using a tee to save the results and then appending them to $GITHUB_OUTPUT in a here-doc style. Verify that the output format produced is compatible with downstream processing.


59-66: Existing Comment Lookup
Using peter-evans/find-comment@v3 to locate an existing comment by the GitHub Actions bot is a good strategy to avoid duplicate comments. The selection criteria with comment-author and body-includes are precise.

Comment on lines 14 to 19
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }}
cache: 'npm'

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

Node.js Setup and Matrix Variable
The Node.js setup step uses node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }} along with caching enabled for npm. However, no matrix is defined for this job, which could lead to runtime issues. Consider either defining a matrix strategy or replacing it with a static Node.js version. For example:

-          node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }}
+          node-version: '16'

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any matrix definitions in the benchmarks workflow file
rg 'matrix:' .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

Length of output: 45


Action Required: Define Matrix or Use a Static Node Version
The workflow currently uses the expression node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }} without providing a corresponding matrix definition. This will likely cause runtime failures. You should either introduce a matrix strategy to supply the Node.js version or replace it with a static version. For instance:

-          node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }}
+          node-version: '16'
  • File: .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (Lines 14-19)
  • Issue: Undefined matrix leading to potential runtime issues
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }}
cache: 'npm'
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '16'
cache: 'npm'
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

17-17: property "node-version" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (2)

19-20: Consider pinning the DFX setup action to a specific version.

Currently, the workflow uses dfinity/setup-dfx@main, which refers to the latest version on the main branch. While this ensures you always get the latest features, it may introduce unexpected changes or breaking updates.

- uses: dfinity/setup-dfx@main
+ uses: dfinity/setup-dfx@v0.3.0

Replace v0.3.0 with the latest stable release version available. This will make your workflow more stable and reproducible.


72-72: Add a newline at the end of the file.

The YAML linter detected that there is no newline character at the end of the file, which is a common convention for text files.

   body: ${{ steps.benchmarks.outputs.result }}
   edit-mode: replace
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 72-72: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b26999 and 4293202.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .bench/1-buffer-vector-add.bench.json (1 hunks)
  • .bench/2-vector-buffer-add.bench.json (1 hunks)
  • .bench/array.bench.json (1 hunks)
  • .bench/removeLast.bench.json (1 hunks)
  • .bench/stable-memory.bench.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (1 hunks)
  • cli/commands/bench.ts (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • .bench/2-vector-buffer-add.bench.json
  • .bench/removeLast.bench.json
  • .bench/stable-memory.bench.json
  • .bench/1-buffer-vector-add.bench.json
  • .bench/array.bench.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
cli/commands/bench.ts (1)
cli/commands/test/reporters/compact-reporter.ts (1) (1)
  • res (75-99)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml

[error] 72-72: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ./cli/dist
  • GitHub Check: macos-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ./cli/dist
  • GitHub Check: node 20, moc 0.11.1, ic-mops@1.0.0
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/benchmarks.yml (3)

17-17: Node.js setup now correctly uses caching without a matrix.

The Node.js setup step correctly implements caching for npm dependencies without requiring a matrix definition. This resolves the issue from the previous review.


53-56: Good approach to capturing benchmark results.

Using the GITHUB_OUTPUT approach with the heredoc syntax (<<EOF) is the recommended way to handle multi-line outputs in GitHub Actions, especially for benchmark results that may contain formatting.


58-72: Effective PR comment mechanism.

The implementation for finding and updating comments is well-structured. Using peter-evans/find-comment and peter-evans/create-or-update-comment together ensures that benchmark results are properly posted as comments without creating duplicates.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 72-72: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

cli/commands/bench.ts (6)

266-266: Good initialization for tracking empty result sets.

Adding the allZero variable to track whether all results for a property are zero is a good approach for determining whether to display the Stable Memory table.


274-276: Effective logic for tracking non-zero values.

The code correctly updates the allZero flag when encountering any non-zero value, which will be used later to determine whether to display the Stable Memory section.


284-286: Good handling of NaN values in percentage calculations.

Converting NaN results to 0 when calculating performance differences ensures that the output remains clean without unexpected "NaN%" displays.


290-296: Clever environment-specific formatting for benchmark results.

The code smartly adapts the output format based on the environment:

  • In CI environments: Uses LaTeX-style formatting for colors that will render properly in GitHub comments
  • In local environments: Uses chalk for terminal-friendly colored output

This approach ensures good readability in both contexts.


323-326: Smart optimization to hide empty tables.

Not displaying the Stable Memory table when all values are zero is a good UX decision that avoids cluttering the output with empty or meaningless tables.


343-343: Consistent conditional rendering.

The conditional rendering of the Stable Memory section aligns with the allZero tracking logic implemented earlier, creating a cleaner and more focused output.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cli/package.json (1)

60-60: Dependency Update: Commander bumped to 13.1.0

This change updates the "commander" dependency from version "12.1.0" to "13.1.0". Please ensure that any CLI functionality—especially the parts interfacing with the newly added GitHub Actions benchmarking workflow—is compatible with the new version, as there may be breaking changes or altered APIs between these versions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2a6d3f and 1bcc807.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • cli/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cli/package.json (1 hunks)
  • frontend/components/package/PackageRightPanel.svelte (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ./cli/dist
  • GitHub Check: macos-latest, node 20, moc 0.11.1, ./cli/dist
  • GitHub Check: node 20, moc 0.11.1, ic-mops@1.0.0
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/components/package/PackageRightPanel.svelte (1)

35-35:

✅ Verification successful

Improved number readability with locale formatting.

Adding toLocaleString() enhances the user experience by formatting large download numbers with appropriate separators, making them easier to read.

To ensure this won't cause runtime errors, verify that packageDetails.downloadsTotal is always a number:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for type definitions or null checks for downloadsTotal
rg "downloadsTotal.*:" -A 2 --type=ts
rg "downloadsTotal.*=" -A 2

Length of output: 2580


Verified Approval: Number Formatting and Type Safety Confirmed

The usage of toLocaleString() in the <div class="value"> for packageDetails.downloadsTotal enhances number readability without introducing runtime errors. Our verification shows that downloadsTotal is defined as a bigint in the type declarations (e.g., in frontend/declarations/main/main.did.d.ts), ensuring that it's always a numeric value. No additional null or error checks are needed.

  • File: frontend/components/package/PackageRightPanel.svelte at line 35
  • Change: Formatting downloadsTotal with .toLocaleString()
  • Verification: The type definition as bigint confirms safe usage without runtime errors.

@ZenVoich ZenVoich merged commit 8e6bc16 into main Mar 21, 2025
29 checks passed
@ZenVoich ZenVoich deleted the bench-comment branch March 21, 2025 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant