-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
Utility::Debug: add std::ostream output operator call converter #88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rune-scape
wants to merge
13
commits into
mosra:master
Choose a base branch
from
rune-scape:pr88
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6964c21
Utility::Debug: DebugOstreamFallback enable if has ostream operator
rune-scape bcc6544
Merge https://github.com/mosra/corrade into pr88
rune-scape dfa849b
Move DeclareLvalueReference to TypeTraits.h
rune-scape 8b1e935
Utility::Debug: add HasDebugStreamOperator check to DebugOstreamFallback
rune-scape cf3f6fd
Utility::Debug: added std::ostream output operator call converter.
rune-scape 8b048e6
Utility: doc++
rune-scape 05cfb24
Utility::Debug: OstreamDebug::operator<< is now in its own namespace
rune-scape 3b75172
Utility::Debug: more docs
rune-scape be5dfa9
Utility: snippet had narrowing conversion
rune-scape 9abf7c3
Utility: DebugTest.cpp: corrected sourceLocation test
rune-scape b3129ed
Utility: whitespace at EOL.
mosra 07dad62
Utility: this is how it is expected to work.
mosra ccb7bcd
Utility: eureka!
mosra File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -103,9 +103,46 @@ template<class ...Args> Debug& operator<<(Debug& debug, const std::tuple<Args... | |
|
||
namespace Implementation { | ||
|
||
/* In order to ensure the most fitting operator<< overload gets called, we | ||
can't simply check for *some* operator<< overload. As an example, for Array | ||
there's both operator<<(ostream&, void*) and operator<<(Debug&, Iterable) | ||
that can print it, but only the second one is desirable as the first prints | ||
just a pointer. Directly checking for presence of either via | ||
|
||
decltype(DeclareLvalueReference<std::ostream> << std::declval<T>()) and | ||
decltype(DeclareLvalueReference<Debug> << std::declval<T>()) | ||
|
||
would yield "yes" in both cases, not telling us which one is better. Instead | ||
we supply an object that's implicitly convertible to both as the first | ||
argument, giving the overload resolution magic a chance to pick the better | ||
fitting one. */ | ||
struct OstreamOrDebug { | ||
/*implicit*/ operator std::ostream&(); | ||
/*implicit*/ operator Debug&(); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
CORRADE_HAS_TYPE( | ||
HasBestFittingOstreamOperator, | ||
typename std::enable_if<std::is_same< | ||
decltype(std::declval<OstreamOrDebug>() << std::declval<T>()), | ||
std::add_lvalue_reference<std::ostream>::type | ||
>::value>::type | ||
); | ||
|
||
CORRADE_HAS_TYPE( | ||
HasBestFittingDebugOperator, | ||
typename std::enable_if<std::is_same< | ||
decltype(std::declval<OstreamOrDebug>() << std::declval<T>()), | ||
std::add_lvalue_reference<Debug>::type | ||
>::value>::type | ||
); | ||
|
||
/* Used by Debug::operator<<(Implementation::DebugOstreamFallback&&) */ | ||
struct DebugOstreamFallback { | ||
template<class T> /*implicit*/ DebugOstreamFallback(const T& t): applier(&DebugOstreamFallback::applyImpl<T>), value(&t) {} | ||
template< | ||
class T, | ||
typename = typename std::enable_if<HasBestFittingOstreamOperator<T>::value>::type | ||
> /*implicit*/ DebugOstreamFallback(const T& t): applier(&DebugOstreamFallback::applyImpl<T>), value(&t) {} | ||
|
||
void apply(std::ostream& s) const { | ||
(this->*applier)(s); | ||
|
@@ -128,6 +165,26 @@ struct DebugOstreamFallback { | |
CORRADE_UTILITY_EXPORT Debug& operator<<(Debug& debug, Implementation::DebugOstreamFallback&& value); | ||
#endif | ||
|
||
namespace OstreamDebug { | ||
|
||
/** | ||
@brief Print a builtin type to an ostream | ||
|
||
Allows calls like @cpp std::cout << Magnum::Vector2{0.2, 3.14}; @ce to be | ||
delegated to a @ref Debug object. Creates a @ref Debug object on every call. | ||
*/ | ||
template<typename T> | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. One last thing: can you
Thank you! 👍 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes! wow |
||
typename std::enable_if< | ||
Implementation::HasBestFittingDebugOperator<T>::value, | ||
std::ostream | ||
>::type &operator<<(std::ostream &os, const T &val) { | ||
Corrade::Utility::Debug debug{&os, Corrade::Utility::Debug::Flag::NoNewlineAtTheEnd}; | ||
debug << val; | ||
return os; | ||
} | ||
|
||
} | ||
|
||
}} | ||
|
||
#endif |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a (admittedly weirdly named) CORRADE_HAS_TYPE(className, typeExpression) macro that already contains the above functionality, but your variant seems to be a lot simpler than what I stole from somewhere back in the day :) If I fix the macro to have the second parameter variadic (so the comma doesn't break it), I think we could then reduce the above to be just this (containing the potentially hard-to-understand template magic in a single place):
(Also adapting the naming to what Corrade uses for type traits.) I hope I didn't overlook something that would make this impossible tho.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CORRADE_HAS_TYPE()
is fixed to allow this in 8d4eb5b, and I think it would work with a minor change:I assume you have some way to test the infinite recursion already -- can you confirm? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes! works perfectly. A very useful macro too